Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles (DPSP)
Syllabus Unit: Indian Polity & Governance
Why it matters
Chapter overview
Part III (Fundamental Rights) and Part IV (Directive Principles) together form the Constitution's conscience — one justiciable and individual-rights-focused, the other a non-justiciable roadmap for the state to build a just society. This topic covers the six surviving Fundamental Rights and the five writs that enforce them, the DPSP's philosophy and categories, how courts have repeatedly rebalanced the tension between the two, and the Fundamental Duties added later.
1Fundamental Rights & Writs
Part III guarantees six justiciable rights and, uniquely, makes the right to enforce them (Article 32) itself a Fundamental Right — Dr. Ambedkar called it 'the heart and soul' of the Constitution.
Learning Objectives
- List the six Fundamental Rights currently in force and their article ranges within Part III.
- Explain why the Right to Property was removed from Part III by the 44th Amendment (1978).
- Name the five writs and the article(s) under which the Supreme Court and High Courts can issue them.
- Distinguish Habeas Corpus, Mandamus and Certiorari by what each writ actually does.
Key Terms
Part III (Articles 12-35) guarantees six Fundamental Rights: Right to Equality (14-18), Right to Freedom (19-22), Right against Exploitation (23-24), Right to Freedom of Religion (25-28), Cultural and Educational Rights (29-30), and Right to Constitutional Remedies (32).
The five writs (Articles 32 and 226)
- Habeas Corpus ('have the body') — produces a detained person before the court; secures release if detention is illegal.
- Mandamus ('we command') — directs a public authority to perform a duty it is legally bound to perform.
- Prohibition — issued by a higher court to a lower court/tribunal to stop proceedings that exceed its jurisdiction.
- Certiorari — quashes an order already passed by a lower court/tribunal acting beyond its jurisdiction or with a legal error.
- Quo Warranto ('by what authority') — questions the legality of a person's claim to a public office.
Article 32 lets a citizen move the **Supreme Court directly** for enforcement of Fundamental Rights only; Article 226 lets a citizen move the **High Court**, which can issue writs for Fundamental Rights AND 'any other purpose' — giving High Courts a technically wider writ jurisdiction.